Friday, July 2, 2010
A Jew can grow his beard in order to practice his faith
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
"Does the president think that the Palestinians have a right to resist 35 years of brutal military occupation and suppression?"
Why Helen Thomas had to resign
Photograph: Alex Wong/Getty Images
Helen Thomas listens during the White House daily briefing at the White House in 2008. Photograph: Alex Wong/Getty Images
Chris McGreal
The Guardian Features Wed 9 Jun 2010 01:55 BST
Her fierce questions shocked White House staff; Castro refused to answer her. And now veteran reporter Helen Thomas has had to quit. By Chris McGreal
Fidel Castro was once asked to define the difference between democracy in Cuba and the United States. "I don't have to answer questions from Helen Thomas," the old revolutionary replied.
The grand dame of the White House press corps, who outlasted nine American presidential administrations – and Castro's rule – was finally forced to halt her determined, often opinion-laden questioning and into retirement this week over comments on the issue closest to her heart, the Middle East.
There were no fond farewells for the 89-year-old reporter remembered as a trailblazer for women in journalism but also as a grumpy old contrarian. Her front-row seat in the White House briefing room, in recent years uniquely tagged with her own name rather than that of an organisation, was left empty.
Reporters who variously described Thomas as cranky, stubborn and opinionated said they weren't surprised she'd finally overstepped the mark when she told a rabbi that Jews should "get the hell out of Palestine" and "go home" to Poland and Germany. But the torrent of anger and criticism was tempered by Thomas' lofty status.
By the time of her resignation she had clocked up many firsts: first female officer of the National Press Club and first female president of the White House Correspondents' Association. She worked as a White House reporter for far longer than any other – for half a century. She was probably also the first White House correspondent to have a birthday cake delivered by a president, when Barack Obama arrived bearing cup cakes (they share a birthday).
Thomas joined United Press International in 1943 when it was still a major force in American journalism. She was 23 and had not long left Detroit, where she grew up to Lebanese immigrant parents. Her first job for UPI was reporting on women's issues. She wrote a celebrity column then moved to cover the justice department, FBI and other federal agencies.
She was assigned to cover then President-elect John F Kennedy in late 1960 and so began a reputation for relentless questioning that exasperated American leaders. Kennedy said of her: "Helen would be a nice girl if she'd ever get rid of that pad and pencil."
It was a sentiment echoed down the decades. "Isn't there a war somewhere we could send her to?" Colin Powell, the former US secretary of state, once asked.
Thomas's determined questioning and forthright reporting chipped away at what had long been an all-male and all-white club of reporters that was often regarded as far too cosy with the officials they were writing about, and still is. For many years she was frequently the only woman in the room.
In a photograph of White House correspondents questioning President Lyndon Johnson, Thomas is the only female face. She was also the only female print reporter among the journalists accompanying President Richard Nixon on his historic visit to China in 1972. Barbara Walters was there as part of the NBC television news team.
She became one of the instantly recognised faces on television at presidential press conferences. She was so well known that she played herself in two films, Dave and The American President.
Thomas quit UPI in 2000 after it was bought by the Moonie leader, Reverend Sun Myung Moon. She called the purchase "a bridge too far". She had worked for the agency for 57 years, nearly half of them as UPI's White House bureau chief. That might have been the end of her career. She said she had planned to "hang up my daily news spurs" at the time. But she was approached by Hearst newspapers with an offer to become a columnist.
"I gratefully said, why not? After all those years of telling it like it is, now I can tell it how I want it to be. To put another point on it, I get to wake up every morning and say, 'Who am I mad at today?'" she wrote in her memoir Thanks For The Memories, Mr President. Many of her colleagues were surprised to hear that she regarded herself as having held back until then.
But first there was the question of her seat in the front row of the White House briefing room. Technically it should have gone to someone from one of the major news organisations. But Sam Donaldson, the boisterous former White House correspondent for ABC news, said she kept it because no one could imagine asking her to move to the back of the room. That marked another first for Thomas – an opinion columnist in a reporter's seat in the White House briefing room. Her colleagues noticed an even more strident and opinionated tone to her questioning.
President George Bush had just taken power in a disputed election. In the coming years, Thomas made no secret of her opposition to the war in Iraq, offering a determined line of questioning that some of her colleagues appeared to shy away from in the post 9/11 atmosphere in America.
In 2002, she asked a question that few others at the White House would have dared: "Does the president think that the Palestinians have a right to resist 35 years of brutal military occupation and suppression?"
Her questions were sometimes deemed to be so laden with hostile opinion that one of Bush's press secretaries, Ari Fleischer, once said: "We will temporarily suspend the Q&A portion of today's briefing to bring you this advocacy minute."
But she has not been averse to giving liberal presidents a hard time too. Scott Wilson, White House correspondent for the Washington Post, said Thomas did not go easy on Obama. "She did have a knack for trying to hold this administration accountable, particularly for its Middle East policy. She asked the question about which countries in the Middle East have nuclear weapons," he said "They couldn't not take her seriously. Her questions demanded an answer."
Mostly they didn't get one, but that was no less frustrating for those on the receiving end. "What's the difference between your foreign policy and Bush's?" she asked the presidential press secretary, Robert Gibbs.
A fortnight ago she challenged the president over what is increasingly known as "Obama's war". "When are you going to get out of Afghanistan?" she asked. "Why are we continuing to kill and die there? What is the real excuse? And don't give us this Bushism, 'If we don't go there, they'll all come here'."
She was no less forthright in offering her opinion on the recent Israeli attack on the Gaza flotilla, calling it a "deliberate massacre and international crime". The New York Times said in its story about her resignation that two sets of rules applied to reporters covering the president: "those for the regular White House correspondents, and those for Helen Thomas."
But an alternative view might be that Thomas was a courageous voice in an often craven White House press corps.
Even if White House correspondents sometimes grew exasperated with her, some said they respected her pedigree and generally put her shortcomings down to age. She grew so frail that other reporters had to help her walk from her desk to her chair in the briefing room, and she would sometimes fall asleep. She appeared less and less at the daily briefings.
Perhaps the best evidence that Thomas had lost touch was her failure to understand the consequences of saying that Israel's Jews should go back to Poland and Germany to a rabbi with a video camera at a White House event to mark Jewish heritage month. It is possible that given her Lebanese background, that is what she has thought all along. But she should not have been surprised at the storm of protest.
Donaldson, who describes Thomas as a friend, said that while he would not defend her comments they probably reflect the views of many people of Arab descent. He then called her a "pioneer" for women. "No one can take that away from Helen,".
anti-islam-commentators-who-shame-helen-thomas?!
Veteran White House correspondent Helen Thomas has left the building after making some comments about getting Jews in Israel to go back to Europe. Perhaps rather silly and certainly likely to upset the Zionist establishment – though, seriously, where's the outrage over the countless anti-Islam comments since 9/11? and hardly a hanging offense – this profile in the Guardian outlines her many achievements and ends with this:
Donaldson, who describes Thomas as a friend, said that while he would not defend her comments they probably reflect the views of many people of Arab descent. He then called her a "pioneer" for women. "No one can take that away from Helen," he said.
Jon Stewart is just, well, upset about all it:
*HELEN* *THOMAS DESERVES PRAISE
Fearless, decent seeker-of-truth Helen Thomas, 89, the preeminent
challenger of political power for a half-century as dean of White House
correspondents, has resigned her position with Hearts Newspapers. She
acted in the wake of controversy that erupted when she told reporters
"Jews should get the hell out of Palestine." While speaking plainly on
behalf of the rule of law in Occupied Palestine, her message was
submerged when reporters gave it an anti-Semitic twist by quoting words
out of context.
It is a sad finale to an unprecedented career in aggressive,
constructive journalism. In her departure from the White House newsroom,
America is the loser. The Washington press corps contains few with
Thomas' talent in challenging power close-up.
The fiasco start when Thomas made an extemporaneous burst of passion at
a White House briefing in late May. She declared, "Jews should get the
hell out of Palestine." When asked where they should go, Thomas said
they should "go home to Poland, Germany, America and everywhere else."
Her intent was unmistakable: Jews are unlawfully residing in Occupied
Palestine and should leave. She made no reference to Jews in pre-1967
Israel, where all Jews can lawfully reside.
Out-of-context reports on her comments stirred angry controversy.
Several commentators failed to report the words "America and everywhere
else." This left Thomas' quoted words suggesting only Poland and German,
countries identified with extermination camps for Jews in World War II,
as the only destinations for those Thom would expel. The warped reports
led Diane Nine, her longtime literary agent and friend, to cut ties. She
was uninvited after agreeing to be commencement speaker at a Washington,
D.C. high school, and was falsely smeared as a bigot and anti-Semite by
leaders of Jewish organizations. /Time /columnist Joe Klein wanted her
moved from her traditional front row seat to the back at future White
House news briefings. Former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer,
who served President George W. Bush, told reporters she should be fired
by employer Hearst Newspapers or at least lose her White House credentials.
Attempts to link Thomas' outburst to Nazi crematories are contemptible.
In denouncing Thomas, Klein and others mention only Poland and Germany
as places Thomas wants Jews now in Palestine to go. If they included
"America and everywhere else," as Thomas actually stated, the attempted
linkage of past Holocaust crematories would be blurred if not lost.
True to her reputation, Thomas spoke up for human rights, the
fundamental property rights of Palestinians that are violated at an
ever-rising pace in Occupied Palestine by the government of Israel, with
no serious opposition from the United States, Israel's main benefactor.
Thanks to an intimidated U.S. media, most Americans are unaware of the
plight of Palestinians, who are all Arab and mostly Muslim. Almost all
Jews who live in what is left of Palestine are euphemistically called
"settlers" by U.S. media, not as unlawful occupiers. By residing in
Palestine, they violate international law, Geneva Accords, and clear
stipulations of the UN Charter. The rare exceptions are a handful of
Jews who belong to a peaceful, independent sect.
This dark, undeserved cloud over the reputation of an unrelenting grand
champion of human rights will have a silver lining if it awakens the
American people to their own quiet, complicit role in Israel's sustained
violation of Palestinian rights.
I offer unique credentials in defending Thomas. Although a lifelong
admirer, I first met her in October 2009 at a dinner in Washington. When
I greeted her, she addressed me as /They/ /Dare/ /to/ /Speak/ /Out/
Findley, using the title of my bestseller book published in 1985. At my
invitation she spoke this past April to a capacity, enthusiastic crowd
at Illinois College, Jacksonville, Illinois. While hosting her at dinner
the previous evening, I found her a delightful, warm, compassionate
human being dedicated to equal justice for all.
For her edifying outburst, Helen Thomas should be congratulated, not
condemned. It could prove to be one of her finest contributions in our
nation's often-faltering quest for justice.
Paul Findley resides in Jacksonville, Illinois. He served 22 as a U.S.
representative from Illinois. He is the author of a highly praised
biography, /A. Liincoln: The Crucible of Congress /and four books on the
Arab-Israeli conflict, the latest being a memoir tentatively titled,
/Taking the High Road: Confronting Bias, Bigotry, War. /It/ is
/scheduled for publication next spring by Lawrence Hill Books.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
What is not allowed?
RICHARD TILLINGHAST
Richard Tillinghast is an American poet who lives in Co Tipperary. He is the author of eight books of poetry, the latest of which is Selected Poems (Dedalus Press, 2010 ), as well as several works of non-fiction
* <http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2010/0605/1224271903842.html#>
No tinned meat is allowed, no tomato paste,
no clothing, no shoes, no notebooks.
These will be stored in our warehouses at Kerem Shalom
until further notice.
Bananas, apples, and persimmons are allowed into Gaza,
peaches and dates, and now macaroni
(after the American Senator's visit).
These are vital for daily sustenance.Pumpkins and carrots you may have, but no delicacies,
But no apricots, no plums, no grapes, no avocados, no jam.
These are luxuries and are not allowed.
Paper for textbooks is not allowed.
The terrorists could use it to print seditious material.
And why do you need textbooks
now that your schools are rubble?
No steel is allowed, no building supplies, no plastic pipe.
These the terrorists could use to launch rockets
against us.
no cherries, no pomegranates, no watermelon, no onions,
no chocolate.
We have a list of three dozen items that are allowed,
but we are not obliged to disclose its contents.
This is the decision arrived at
by Colonel Levi, Colonel Rosenzweig, and Colonel Segal.
Our motto:
'No prosperity, no development, no humanitarian crisis.'
You may fish in the Mediterranean,
but only as far as three km from shore.
Beyond that and we open fire.
It is a great pity the waters are polluted
twenty million gallons of raw sewage dumped into the sea every day
is the figure given.
Our rockets struck the sewage treatments plants,
and at this point spare parts to repair them are not allowed.
As long as Hamas threatens us,
no cement is allowed, no glass, no medical equipment.
We are watching you from our pilotless drones
as you cook your sparse meals over open fires
and bed down
in the ruins of houses destroyed by tank shells.
And if your children can't sleep,
missing the ones who were killed in our incursion,
or cry out in the night, or wet their beds
in your makeshift refugee tents,
or scream, feeling pain in their amputated limbs –
that's the price you pay for harbouring terrorists.
God gave us this land.
A land without a people for a people without a land.
--
Greta Berlin, Co-Founder
+357 99 18 72 75
witnessgaza.com
www.freegaza.org
http://www.flickr.com/photos/freegaza
--
Reema Abu Hamdieh
Correspondent
Rusiya Al Yaum (Russia Today)
1325 G St. N.W.
Suite #250
Washington D.C. 20005
Mobile: 202-378-3886
Friday, June 4, 2010
Erdogan: Hamas not a terrorist group
Photo by: Associated Press
Erdogan reportedly said Hamas, the legitimate winner of the Palestinian elections, was fighting for its land. "You are always talking about democracy. You'll never let Hamas rule. What kind of democracy is this?" he reportedly said, apparently addressing the Israeli leadership.
Why not Mr. Obama? Let Alqaeda investigate September 11th.
Why not Mr. Obama? Let Alqaeda investigate September 11th.
"No Mr. Obama, no Mr. Biden, both of you are very very wrong. Your decision to support Israel and justify the cold-blooded murder on the high sea is an insult to every American and an insult to the decent and free people of the world. Your demands that Israel investigate its own crimes is like asking Alqaeda to investigate September 11th and the crimes it committed. Sorry no one is buying your sense of logic and your excuses.
What Israel did was wrong deadly wrong and your statements and decisions in the UN Security Council and in statements from the White House, and State Department shows a callus disregard for the lives of innocent people. That when it comes to Israel, America is always on standby, ready to defend, and cover any and all Israeli war crimes and ready to make sure that Israel continues with its defiance of the world community in defiance of the world community.
It is clear by now that the Obama-Biden White House is no different from the Bush-Cheney White House when it comes to acts of wars and cold-blooded murder committed by Israel.
Mr. Obama your logic of allowing Israel to conduct its own investigations of the heinous crime it committed make no sense when Israel is the party that committed the murder and committed the crime. If we are to follow your logic then the US should have allowed Osama Bin Laden and Alqaeda to conduct its own investigation of the horrendous crime of September 11th.
Mr. Biden your logic of calling on Israel to conduct is own investigations also makes no sense and your analogy on the Charley Rose Show of having South Korea conduct its own investigations of the sinking of it own ship, then if we are to follow your logic then Turkey as the victim should be the one that should conduct the investigation and not Israel. If this is the case then the US should allows all of the criminals to investigate their own crimes leaving the government out of such investigation. Of course Mr. Charley Rose missed the opportunity and perhaps for good personal and political reasons and failed to follow up on the statements and logic of the Vice-President.
Mrs. Clinton was even more cozier with the Israeli position when it came to the fact that one of the victims shot dead in the head 4 times and once in the chest once was an American citizen. Of course this is what we as American should expect from our government, double standard when it comes to who is the victim and who are the perpetrator of the crimes. If the victims were Jewish Americans and the perpetrators of the crime was an Arab or a Muslim, then all hell break lose and US will dispatch a team of the FBI, NSC and CIA to investigate the murder and US courts will rule in favor of the victim’s family awarding them hundreds of millions under applicable terrorism acts, However when the victim is an Arab American or Turkish American their lives are of no consequences to the White House or the State Department, especial if the perpetrator of the crime is Israel or an armed Jewish settlers.
The US should take full responsibility for the crime committed by Israel on the high seas. The US has its hands full of blood, the blood of the poor innocent and unarmed victims because the US was and remains a partner with Israel in the siege and blockade of Gaza and bears the consequences of any and all deaths and injuries caused by the criminal Israelis.
One has to wonder when the US will live up to its own laws, to its own moral and ethical values and constitutional standards. It seems that when it comes to Israel all of these valuable issues, where millions of Americans died for are tossed in the garbage in order to satisfy or perhaps out of fear of Israel, its lobby and its sponsors in Washington. I guess we were very very wrong when we believed that “change†would also cover the Middle East. Perhaps now there is a need for tour government and the State Department to reclassify its citizens in terms of faith, and political affiliations. I guess “equal under the law†is tossed out of the window. I guess an Arab-American or a Turkish â€"American are less “worthy†in the eyes of Mrs. Clinton and her State Department."